Home / FINANCE / Markets Insider / ‘Wrong to report’: The Guardian is backtracking on a argumentative story about WhatsApp (FB)

‘Wrong to report’: The Guardian is backtracking on a argumentative story about WhatsApp (FB)

WhatsApp and Facebook follower icons are seen on an iPhone in Manchester , Britain Mar 27, 2017. REUTERS/Phil Noble Thomson Reuters

The Guardian on Wednesday published changes to a argumentative story that creatively claimed Facebook’s renouned messaging service, WhatsApp, had a “backdoor” that could give third parties a approach to review private messages. 

The strange story has not been taken down, though it has been revised and there is now a distinguished editor’s note during a top. 

In a prolonged post, Paul Chadwick, The Guardian’s reader’s editor, pronounced “The Guardian was wrong to news final Jan that a renouned messaging use WhatsApp had a confidence smirch so critical that it was a outrageous hazard to leisure of speech.”

WhatsApp, that has over one billion users, never had a “backdoor.” It did, however, make some decisions in preference of usability that some confidence experts suspicion compromised a complement to a few kinds of conflict that other researchers believed were unlikely. 

Even WhatsApp pushed back, with co-founder Brian Acton formerly revelation Business Insider in a matter that “The Guardian’s story on an purported ‘backdoor’ in WhatsApp is false.”

An editor’s note

However, Chadwick pronounced he did not trust a strange story should be retracted, and shielded The Guardian’s choice to “bring to far-reaching open notice an aspect of WhatsApp” that had a intensity to make some private messages vulnerable.

The story has been a outrageous lightning rod given it was initial published in January. Zeynep Tufekci, a researcher and op-ed author for a New York Times, published an open minute with over 70 vital confidence researchers operative during vital universities and companies like Google condemning a story.

One vital worry about a story was that it could be used to explain that WhatsApp is not secure, potentially pulling activists and other groups to use some-more non-secure messaging services. Chadwick pronounced a Turkish central had cited The Guardian essay when attempting to “deter users from WhatsApp.” 

From a open letter: 

“The summary listened by activists, reporters and typical people around a universe was clear: WhatsApp has a backdoor, it’s insecure, don’t use it.

“Since a announcement of this story, we’ve celebrated and listened from disturbed activists, reporters and typical people who use WhatsApp, who tell us that people are switching to SMS and Facebook Messenger, among other options–many services that are particularly reduction secure than WhatsApp.”

This is what a title of a strange story now looks like: 

Screen Shot 2017 06 28 during 10.00.11 AMThe Guardian

You can review a Guardian’s entire editor’s note here. The revised story is here. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Check Also

Miller Heiman Group, LinkedIn Team Up to Show Sales Leaders How to Inject Science into Selling

SYDNEY, Oct. 23, 2017 /PRNewswire/ — Miller Heiman Group, one of a largest sales and ...